The success of the Wrestlecrap book prompted Wrestlecrap curator R.D. Reynolds to cook up another book. One that would tackle the rise and fall of once-prominent wrestling promotion known as World Championship Wrestling. This time, however, he wouldn’t be alone as he would partner up with Figure 4 Weekly head Bryan Alvarez to chronicle this interesting look into what made WCW the dominant force that almost drove the World Wrestling Federation into bankruptcy before everything fell apart… hence why the book is called The Death Of WCW and not The Life Of WCW.
Category: Written Reviews
COMIC REVIEW – Batman #666 (July 2007)
I find it rather funny that several years ago, nothing particularly “evil” or “devil-themed” was conjured up for the 666th issues of Action Comics or Detective Comics, and yet here we are. Superman and Batman’s long running series had recently reached the number of the beast and both involve the devil in some form or another. But while Superman #666 is mostly about him being a dick, Batman #666 gives way to a future storyline in which Batman’s son, Damien, must take up the mantle of the Bat to face the Prince of Darkness… what?
So there’s a real twist here that has the son of Batman facing off against the Anti-Christ Batman or something. Apparently, a deal was made between Bats Jr. and the devil that would prevent the Apocalypse from happening. What kind of deal was it? Well, the obvious kind, of course. There’s the usual devil worshippings and satanic killings that are all the rage in this “devil-themed” stories. It’s seems done to death before, but it’s just a nice, slick story that it never gets boring or even remotely tedious. It’s a pretty fast paced book.
And it’s got nice art to compliment the book – not to say that it’s breathtaking or anything like that, but the thing with Adam Kubert’s stuff is that it’s consistently smooth regardless of the project being worked on. It successfuly interprets and recreates that dark, moody atmosphere which depicts a city on the verge of Armageddon. I don’t really have much to complain about here as far as the content goes, although I’m pretty sure some people will see this as a pointless cash in of an issue number similar to that of the Beast. But hey, I think it’s a decent cash-in nonetheless.
In a time and day when comic companies rely on tiresome story-arcs and gimmicky crossovers to tell their story or lack thereof, the 666th iteration of Batman is an enthralling read for a one-shot story. The dialogue is good, the art is great, and there is never a dull moment. Perhaps most importantly, it says all it needs to say within the 20+ pages of a single issue and also offers a tease as to what happens next, leaving readers wanting more of this stuff. Definitely worth a look if you’re a Batman fan or a fan of comics in general.
P.S. Waiting until All-Star Batman & Robin finishes up its eternally-long first story-arc before I give it a proper review. Honestly
BOOK REVIEW – Wrestlecrap: The Very Worst Of Professional Wrestling (2003)
With the new Wrestlecrap Book of Lists coming up, it seemed only appropriate that I’d go back and revisit RD Reynold’s first literary opus, which is basically a book version of his Wrestlecrap website.
Note: In case anyone didn’t get this hint, Randy Baer is R.D. Reynolds’ shoot real name. Sorry if I’m breaking the kayfabe here, kids.
Continue reading “BOOK REVIEW – Wrestlecrap: The Very Worst Of Professional Wrestling (2003)”
MOVIE REVIEW – Mr. Bean's Holiday (2007)
Recently got to see this one yesterday, which is surprising to me because I didn’t even know they made another Bean movie until my mother told me about it. Anyway, in this movie, Mr. Bean wins a train trip to Cannes and through his various acts, trouble comes a-brewing.
Not being a big fan of Bean and having seen a few episodes as well as that first flick ten years ago, my expectations weren’t all that high. This is pretty much the same Bean you’ve seen on the show and the first movie and that seems to be enough, as it’s still a pretty funny flick. Even ten years removed from the movie when he lasted played the role, that Rowan guy can still pull it off. Of course, there were some dragging moments, but that’s to be expected with a lot of movies.
If you’re a fan of Bean, you’ll want to watch this movie. If you’re not, this is still a funny, well-done film, although I’d advise you to pick up the movie and some TV episodes if you want to get Bean at his best.
COMIC REVIEW – Superman #666 (Oct. 2007)
So Superman’s long running series has reached the number of the beast, similar to how his other DC rival has reached the number. You could imagine the DC editorial meetings behind the production of this issue:
DC EDITOR #1: Lookie here, folks. Superman has hit six-hundred and sixty-six issues!
DC EDITOR #2: Wow, that’s incredible! How do we celebrate this momentous occasion?
DC WRITER: How about we show a what if tale about what happens when Superman is influenced by the devil from Krypton and decides to kill everybody?
DC EDITOR #1: Nah! That idea sucks! You’re fired!
DC JANITOR: Why don’t you guys just make him a dick for a whole issue?
DC EDITOR #2: Oh yeah! What a great idea! That’ll sell lots of issues!
DC EDITOR #1: YES! This will SO make up for our inconsistent progress of ongoing storylines spanning five hundred issues spread across the few thousand out there!!! You, sir, are a GENIUS! Here’s a promotion!!!
Ahem…
Let’s get this out of the way: the story behind this issue sucks ass. It’s rather pointless, it doesn’t make sense, it doesn’t play into the larger Superman mythos, and most of all, it’s one of the most cliched plotlines out there that was used simply because of the issue’s number. Anyone who is looking for great storytelling in comic books won’t find it in this issue because this issue doesn’t have it. Perhaps most of all, the plot is sort of misleading. This isn’t about Superman being controlled by the devil or being the Anti-Christ or anything like that; this is about Superman being a dick.
Yeah, that’s right. I said it and I’ll go ahead and say it again. Superman is a dick. If all those issues from the Silver Age don’t convince you of this fact, then this issue should be more than enough to kill any doubts you may have had about your favorite superhero.
THAT is what’s going to sell this issue. Superman is a dick all throughout this issue, as fourth-stringer heroine Zatanna will attempt to convince Superman to stop what he’s doing and Supes is like “Yeah, I know I’m doing bad things and I just don’t care” and will just blow her away or something. He does some nasty stuff to Jimmy (not THAT nasty, you pervert!) because the signalwatch buzzing annoys the hell out of Supes. This is superdickery at its absolute best and it is awesome. So yeah, the story sucks, because Superman being the dick he knows he could be just sells the book alone.
Forget the fact that a name writer and a name artist is behind the creation of this book: this isn’t about them. This is about Superman being a dick. Kurt Busiek does a good dick Superman and the art pretty much compliments the issue. It’s not the cleanest art and not my favorite, but it works.
Hats off to DC for allowing Superman to be his good old true dickery self for one whole issue and as a result, create a weird, screwed-up, fun story in a day and age when the most notable thing in comics are nonsensical crossovers and political overtones forced upon a story just because the writer gets a hard-on for them. While the issue does try to play upon some Christian values or something, it’s just fluff for the issue’s true motive. Anyone who longed for the days of Superman charging damsels-in-distress a rescue fee or stealing away Jimmy Olsen’s newly-earned cash will want to pick this up. But if you’re looking for something deep, you won’t find it here.
But come on. Superman’s a dick here. Just as everyone suspected…
P.S. – They didn’t do anything with Action Comics or Detective Comics when THOSE books hit 666. What the heck?
MOVIE REVIEW – Snakes On A Plane (2006)
About a year ago, the hype machine was started off by a bunch of random Internet users over a film called Snakes on a Plane. Despite not knowing much of anything about the movie, it sounded like a cool movie… and hey, it was gonna have Samuel L. Jackson in it, so it has to be good. Of course, the movie bombed when it came out despite the buzz it had going for it. Those that did see it either loved it or hated it. I didn’t get to see it until recently; a full year after the buzz has died down.
If you’re looking for something deep in plot and characterization, then what the hell are you doing reading a review about a movie called “Snakes on a Plane?” The movie has one of the most absurd plots ever conceived (so absurd that the title says it all) and yet it’s awesome. It’s not a good movie and it doesn’t intend on being a good movie. The reason it’s an awesome movie is because it’s an absolutely terrible movie with a ridiculous plot, a cast of characters so one-dimensional and transparent you really don’t care when they get killed off by the poisonous snakes, and the dialogue. Most bad films end up being enjoyable because of certain aspects and you’d have to turn off your brain to enjoy it and this is one of them. It’s not the best popcorn flick out there, but it’s certainly a better bad-movie than some other crappy bad-movies featuring a popular actor and concept *cough* Catwoman *cough*.
Snakes on a Plane is a good bad-movie and if you enjoy a good bad-movie, then check this flick out. Jackson shines in this flick. Let’s hope that despite the bomb, it gets a sequel.
MOVIE REVIEW – Evil Dead 2: Dead By Dawn (1987)
The Evil Dead trilogy is an interesting piece of business when you look at the grand scope of the whole thing. In the beginning, you had the original Evil Dead film, which was a decently conceived horror flick built on a crummy budget, some amateurish performances, and a lot of Bruce Campbell getting the crap beaten out of him and then covering him in said crap.
On the other side, you have the Army of Darkness, a much slicker film with a bigger budget, but is more of a comedic fantasy film; its horror aspects having been somewhat toned down from that early effort. However, sitting in between these two very opposite films is the middle child of the trilogy, Evil Dead II: Dead By Dawn.
Evil Dead II represented the series’ transition from pure horror movie to slapstick comedy; I believe Bruce Campbell referred to it as “splatstick”. This sequel – a partial remake that retells the first movie but a sequel nonetheless – is more light-hearted than the original and whatever horror elements are used in comic effect. The movie isn’t taken as seriously as it was the first time around and I think that helps a bit as it gives the Ash character some personality instead of just the gutless coward that he was in the first movie.
Don’t confuse light-heartedness with kid-friendly; despite having comic moments, this is still partially a horror flick and there is gratuitous gore and graphic violence. It doesn’t really go overboard however; there weren’t any tree rapings like in the first one. Still, there’s a bit more money put into this one. Bruce Campbell is on the verge of finding that voice for Ash that he’d eventually develop in Army Of Darkness and the rest of the cast that ended up roped into this party turned out slightly better (if not some cliche) performances on this second go-around.
Evil Dead 2 is probably my favorite of the three films. It retains some of the horror aspects that made the first movie memorable while starting to invoke some of Army Of Darkness’s playfulness without leaning into full-bore parody. Army may be the more quotable one, but there’s plenty of good stuff in Dead By Dawn.
GameFAQs Review – Marvel Vs. Capcom 2 (Xbox)
First there was X-Men. Then there was Marvel Super Heroes. Then X-Men came back and tussled with Street Fighters. Then it was Marvel’s turn. Then other Capcom heroes joined the fray. Now we get to Marvel vs. Capcom 2, where a whole bunch of fighters from both universes show up and beat the tar out of each in pixelated fashion. Admittingly, this can be a fun party game if you have a bunch of guys together, but does that equal a good game? Let’s find out.
Continue reading “GameFAQs Review – Marvel Vs. Capcom 2 (Xbox)”
GameFAQs Review – Mortal Kombat: Armageddon (Xbox)
Since its debut in the early nineties, Mortal Kombat had become something of a long-running franchise that built its empire on the bloodied skulls and dismembered torsos of controversy, spawning a new string of violent video games. It’s probably because of this violence that it became a household name, enough to get a movie, a cartoon, a live-action television show, and even some action figures and card games. But then, it happened; Mortal Kombat got repetitive, the novelty of performing ridiculous finishing moves went stale, and people moved on. Years later, the crew behind MK remade the series into a deeper 3D fighting game (well, deeper than the older games) and people noticed.
And now, with the new consoles taking over the reigns, Midway decided to release the last MK game for the PS2/X-Box generation of consoles. It can easily be considered the 3D equivalent of Mortal Kombat Trilogy, which was the last 2D game before the shift to 3D. How does this game fare in comparison to that release? Let’s find out.
Continue reading “GameFAQs Review – Mortal Kombat: Armageddon (Xbox)”
MOVIE REVIEW – The Evil Dead (1981)
Having heard about the series of movies for a while but never having the chance to watch them until recently, I’ve managed to throw my two cents on the cult Evil Dead trilogy. Chances are it’s nothing you haven’t heard before, but let me have my piece.
If you want to know about how Bruce Campbell became a cult figure for his portrayal of the idiot Ash Williams, then by all means, DON’T WATCH THIS MOVIE. The subtleties of Ash were introduced in the sequels (Evil Dead II and Army of Darkness). The original Evil Dead contains no slapstick nor witty catchphrases; it’s a straight-up horror film and one that is quite effective despite its age and cheap look.
The first few scenes are mere fluff pieces that introduces us to the victims… er, I mean, characters. The acting in these scenes are okayish; not the greatest, but not utterly horrific like in other horror movies. Then you get to the actual horror stuff and it doesn’t really let up until the tail-end of the movie. While it is cheap looking (the budget wasn’t really that high), it still tends to be effective even in this day of high-end special effects and cheap gimmicks. For those wondering, Bruce does chickenshit Ash well here, although he doesn’t really shine until the sequels. But let’s not jump ahead.
The original Evil Dead movie proves that you don’t need a billion-dollar budget or high-end production to produce a good horror flick. If you can find the DVD (which includes a few outtakes and commentaries, including a great one by Bruce Campbell), pick it up.
Next up: Evil Dead II.